Overseas Think Tank for Indonesia

facilitating intellectuals to contribute to indonesia

THE GROWTH OF GNP, THE INCREASE OF POVERTY AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA

with 8 comments

With Kuntjoro-Jakti

By Beni Bevly

It’s my tendency to get to know the topic more from the seminar or discussion that I am going to attend. The night before attending the discussion in San Francisco, CA, USA with Dorodjatun Kuntjoro-Jakti (MA ‘66 Public Admin and PhD ‘81 Political Science UC Berkeley Alumnus) who was a Professor of Economics at the University of Indonesia, Former Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs, and the 14th former Indonesian Ambassador to the United States, I conducted a brief research on current Indonesia economy. There were two findings that’s quite interesting. First, about the positive progress of Indonesia economy represented by statistics economy growth, and second, it shows the decrease of wealth, increase of poverty and unemployment rate among Indonesian people. How could it be? I thought the discussion with Dr. Kuntjoro-Jakri would help me to understand this issue better.

In that seminar, he presented the statistic data regarding IV quarter of 2007 Indonesia economy improvement and a new tendency that was happening in Indonesia economy which involved private equity that had been buying undervalue, under-manged and high risk companies, including public companies. He called it P2P (Private Equity to Public) business. All the data he presented was so impressive and very promising. In term of economic growth, he mentioned from 1998 with -13.8% of GDP, has been improving persistently up to 6.3% in 2007 and would be 6.5-7% in 2008. In term of investment, it raised to 145% from 2006. He also mentioned that inflation was under control, which was around 6% in 2007-2009. And there were many other information and statistics to support the argument that Indonesia economy was already in the right track.

Unfortunately, I did not get the answer for my contradictory findings, which were the positive progress of Indonesia economy represented by statistics economy growth on one side, and showed the decrease of wealth, increase of poverty and unemployment rate among Indonesian people on the other side. In fact, my expectation on this seminar was not too high considering that Dr. Kuntjoro-Jakti had different reputation compared to his seniors at the University of California Berkeley who were known as Berkeley Mafia. He was considered as an populist scholar and a supporter of the rights and power of the people. Below is the statement I quoted from Kompas:

“Akan tetapi, sebetulnya posisi yang diambil Dorodjatun itu tidaklah aneh, bahkan mungkin dia memang tidak pas untuk dimasukkan ke dalam kelompok “epistemis liberal”. Meskipun dia dikenal sebagai generasi terakhir Mafia Berkeley, dia sebetulnya sudah menyimpang dari jalur liberalisme ekonomi yang dianut kelompok teknokrat tersebut.

Dalam sebuah diskusi Senat Mahasiswa di FISIP UI, dia secara bercanda mengatakan bahwa Pemerintah Indonesia waktu itu berhenti mengirimkan ekonom mudanya ke Berkeley setelah melihat hasil dari generasi terakhirnya (maksudnya dirinya sendiri) menjadi melenceng. Maka, kalau dulu Hadi Soesastro mengajar pengantar ekonomi di FISIP UI memakai textbook Samuelson, Dorodjatun lebih menyukai textbook Todaro.”

He even did not refer to Samuelson’s Economic text book when he taught at the college, instead he used Todaro’s.

As we know, Paul Anthony Samuelson (born May 15, 1915) is an American neoclassical economist who wrote Economics. Samuelson’s text was first published in 1948, and it immediately became the authority for the principles of economics courses. The book continues to be the standard-bearer for principles courses, and this revision continues to be a clear, accurate, and interesting introduction to modern economics principles. Bill Nordhaus is now the primary author of this text, and he has revised the book to be as current and relevant as ever.

Whereas, Michael P. Todaro is an American economist and is a pioneer in the field of transportation economics. His Economic Development in the Third World is a book to aim at undergraduates and focuses on development problems such as poverty, inequality and unemployment. In order to help students grasp important economic concepts, emphasis is placed on explaining them in the context of the actual problems confronting Third World policy makers.

However, there is always the other side of a coin. An article which discusses his economy policy on Pikiran Rakyat news paper mentions:

“Sementara itu ketua Tim Pemantau Kebijakan Publik P3R Ahmad Iskandar menambahkan, semua kebijakan ekonomi yang dikeluarkan tim Menko Ekuin Kabinet Gotong Royong (Dorodjatun Kuncoro Jakti cs) cenderung hanya meniru konsepsi kebijakan yang dibuat oleh arsitek ekonomi Orde Baru yang lebih mementingkan kepentingan pihak asing ketimbang kepentingan rakyat. ”Kami menyayangkan kinerja Pak Dorodjatun yang memperlihatkan dirinya tidak lebih hanya kelanjutan dari ”mafia berkeley” generasi kedua,” ungkap Iskandar.

Ia menambahkan, krisis ekonomi nasional yang sudah berlangsung hampir 5 tahun tidak bisa dilepaskan dari kesalahan konsepsi, policy, dan strategi pembangunan yang dibuat arsitek ekonomi Orde Baru yang beken disebut Mafia Berkeley (Widjojo Nitisastro, Ali Wardhana, Emil Salim, M. Sadli, dan Subroto).”

Basically, this article discusses that Dr. Kuntjoro-Jakti’s performance as Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs was the continuation from Berkeley Mafia who prioritized foreigners’ vested interest and set aside people’s interest.

Despite of the above arguments, from February 2005 to March 2006, the poverty rate increased from 16.0 to 17.8 percent. There are 39 million people, 4 million more than in 2005, who were getting poorer. There are two main elements that caused the increasing of poverty rate. First, the increase of fuel price. Once, it increased 126% in 2005, and the majority of the people still feel the impact until today. Second the increase of rice price. Between February 2005 and March 2006 the rice price increased double. While the people wages barely increased. The number of poor Indonesians would have soared even more, to 51 million people according to the statistics office.

According to the CIA-The World Fact Book, the unemployment rate had been increasing steadily since 2004 that stared with 8.70 %, becoming 9.20% in 2005, 11.80% in 2006, and it was estimated 12.50% in 2007. There are two main elements that cause the unemployment keeps increasing in Indonesia. First, the economic development does not reach the rural areas. From time to time, these areas are far left behind. Many of them are getting poorer. People who live in these areas no longer can rely on what they have been doing to support their life. As a result, a lot of them seek for jobs in urban areas such as Jakarta, Surabaya and other big cities. Many of them become jobless and they even create more problems in big cities, such as increasing crime rate.

Second, there is lack of trained human resources. According to a recent international survey on quality of human resources, Indonesia ranked 59th among 60 developing countries surveyed, just below Vietnam. From 106 million-strong work force, 18% have never attended school, 36% are elementary school graduates and dropouts, 20% are junior high school graduates, 21% are senior high school graduates and less than 6 percent are academy and university graduates (Jakarta Post, retrieved on November 12, 2007). The industries have offered numerous job opportunities but they cannot be filled because of the absence people or lack of competence.

What these tell us? Even though Indonesian GDP growth has persistently improved since 1999, however, first, the economy development does not support agricultural development and its infrastructure, especially in cultivating rice or paddy properly. Second, the development only concentrates mostly in big cities. Third, there is no real effort and political will to establish effective and efficient power/energy plant and refinery and/or look for fossil fuel substitution. Fourth, the education system/program does not match to the requirement of the labor market. Because of these four elements, poverty and unemployment remain increase, regardless how much the statistics show that Indonesia economy improves.

_____
*Beni Bevly holds BA in Political Science, MBA in Marketing, and is a DBA (Doctor of Business Administration) candidate. He is the founder of Overseas Think Tank for Indonesia.

Written by Beni Bevly

November 12th, 2007 at 6:30 pm

8 Responses to 'THE GROWTH OF GNP, THE INCREASE OF POVERTY AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'THE GROWTH OF GNP, THE INCREASE OF POVERTY AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA'.

  1. A good one, once again. I mean the article is very worthwhile.
    It may help to debunk the triumphalism of neoliberal capitalism.

    But the message is saddening of course. The distribution of wealth under laissez-faire economies in Indonesia is the same as elsewhere (vide: The Shock Doctrine): a small number of disgusting rich and an overwhelming majority struggling to keep afloat … or drowning.

    Unfortunately all but a very few economists ( Stiglitz) have turned to “believers” – free market, deregulation and privatization is the gospel and Friedman is their prophet. It takes a lot of courage, brainpower and vision to dissent and think out of the box.

    colson

    13 Nov 07 at 12:30 am

  2. Beni, good analysis.
    From your four points I would like to comment as below:
    - First and second, actually can be fixed with the regional autonomy policy (otonomi daerah) but practically it does not work as expected due to many things. I think you know why.
    - Third, regarding energy the government just released a National Energy Policy (Kebijaksanaan Energi Nasional) in January 2006. The main point mention there is an effort to reduce oil energy resources below 20% by 2025. But I found out that at the end we still rely on more than 80% of energy from fossil fuel include oil, gas and coal. So let see in 2025, yes it is still another 18 years.
    - Fourh, I think you know about this. Government does not invest much on the education sector as we can see in the Financial Note and Annual National Budget (APBN). We always proud of to have a cheap labour instead of skillful labour.
    I hope it will help.

    Susilo Baskoro

    13 Nov 07 at 11:53 pm

  3. You seem to use GNP and GDP interchangebly, which might be a mistake. And also you don’t define poverty at all. Without straightening out what you are talking about, it’s hard to give you a precise answer.

    As for Colson’s disparaging comments on “neo-liberalism” (I still wonder what it really means…) you actually mentioned that the increase in the price of rice and fuel has increased poverty.

    Firstly rice price increases impact the poor more than fuel price increases. If you are liveing on under a dollar a day, you worry about rice more than you do about gas.

    Milton Friedman (and most top economists) would look to slash rice prices by allowing free imports.

    As I said fuel price increases probably don’t hit the dollar a day or under poor too much, moreover the government has the chance to redirect what went on fuel subsidies into education and healthcare.

    Does much of that cash reach actually reach education and healthcare? Well, I am willing to bet that it can only be less corrupt than the corruption that has gone on around oil subsidies in Indonesia!

    And again Milton Friedman would back a zeroing of subsidies, and again it is the right decision to substantially cut poverty.

    John Orford

    16 Nov 07 at 11:46 am

  4. Colson, Susilo and John, thank you for your comments and inputs.

    Colson, I believe in contingency theory, which tells us to implement different strategy in different situation. That’s why Indonesian government or the one who has power still needs to be involved in distribution of wealth fairly. Today, there are more people who become conglomerates and rich (including government officials) by manipulating, exploiting and corrupting resources unfairly. They do not care and make fun of the words of “integrity”, “honesty” and “fair”. You will be shocked to hear the conversation among them that they are proud if they can cheat and be “smarty”. If they do so, many Indonesia people, including themselves, consider themselves as intelligent persons.

    Susilo, thank you for the clarification. You statements are helpful and important to me.

    John, I meant GDP only. However, correct me if I am wrong, if I had used GNP in Indonesia economy context interchangeably, it would have not made big difference because there is no significant services and goods produces by Indonesia out side its region. I agree with the meaning of GDP and GNP as stated on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product.

    I agree with you that the increase of rice price is the no. 1 element that created more poor people in Indonesia, but I also see the relationship between the increase of fuel price and the number of poor people in Indonesia since fuel price effects services and goods prices.

    Probably Colson can explain “neo-liberalism”, I might have slightly different understanding.

    Beni Bevly

    19 Nov 07 at 12:04 pm

  5. Perhaps the GNP vs GDP point is academic in Indonesia’s case — but it’s nice to know exactly what’s being posited :)

    As for fuel price increase being related to the level of poverty, it’s hard for me to give unreputable proof. But, for me a government that subsidises fuel is wasting time and money, I’d rather a government that spends time, energy and money on fighting poverty directly!

    John Orford

    8 Dec 07 at 7:23 am

  6. [...] to terms with the bloody coup by Suharto in 1965. But even more at heart is the very recent one on money . On the distribution of money that [...]

  7. John Orford, I understand your point of view regarding fuel price increase and I agree to use money on fighting poverty directly. The problem, does the Indonesian government do it? And how?

    As far your concern about how the fuel price increase can create more poor people in Indonesia, probably I can mention it this way. In Indonesia, the price of good/product mostly ties or relates to the fuel price. If the fuel price increases, others will follow. On the other hand, most people earn the same amount of wages. As a result, people will not have purchasing power as strong as before. I view this phenomenon as a process where people become poorer.

    Beni Bevly

    12 Dec 07 at 5:10 pm

  8. I remember this quote (though I don’t remember who said it):
    “If everyone in China consumes just as much as those in the US, we will need the resources equal to three earths to satisfy their demands”

    Poverty in Indonesia is closely related to population growth. This has to do with social structure of Indonesia. We have no social security for the elderly, therefore people (especially poor people who have no private trust fund to rely on) are having children for their insurances. To take care of them when they grow old. They also expect their children to hold the same belief… thus the explosion of poor population.

    Perhaps this sounds a little bit extreme, but I think it’s a good idea to discourage poor people to have more kids than they can afford to.

    Population growth can be an asset, but in this case, I think it is more of a burden to Indonesia.

    Cheers.

    irwan s

    29 Jan 08 at 10:48 am

Leave a Reply